What they don’t tell you about Global Warming

I can deeply understand if in the middle of the Ukrainian war you tend to forget about the pandemic saga, and the age old climate change hysteria. To be honest until recently, there was no problem that was as boring and annoying as the hysterical climate change theory caused by human emissions, which was uttered to boredom but never gained complete certainty. That was I felt with regards to theory at least. In reality, however, I am not a scientist and cannot know the truth about climate change and as well as about the connection with human activity. I just instinctively abhor everything that is popular and overused, as nonconformist. Otherwise, I am suspicious and skeptical about everything the power supports.

I understand the feeling of others and reactions that this propaganda has provoked from me either until recently, which is a counter propaganda: It’s a lie, great business, there’s no evidence, it only has political and ideological purposes, and so on. However, I have realized that these counter-arguments do not work, the debate becomes pointless, and as I mentioned, I am not a climatologist. I cannot take a position on this issue due to lack of skills and sufficient knowledge.

Suppose politicians and climate scientists are right, climate change is a real problem, and man is the source of the problem. Why not? The question is what to do. What is the solution? The problem is that I don’t hear any specific proposals from climate advocates besides raising taxes, buying and selling carbon dioxide quotas, and encouraging austerity. Okay admitted, driving Tesla can be a solution:). So it cannot be said that there is absolutely no progress on this ground.

First, who are the main culprits, the causes of climate change, and the biggest emitters? I suppose you exactly know the answers of radical leftist, and green activists: the industrialisation, Capitalism, big corporations, overdevelopment, rich countries, exploitation, ect.. For me, however, these accusations do not bark at the tree, only at the shadow of the tree. Even if these were true, they are not the causes of the problem, only the consequences of the problem. The causes of global warming are precisely those who think it is a problem and those who blame others the most, they are, the ologarchic ruling elite, and the earth’s global rulers, which I will prove here. The loudest whose house is burning.

Who has the sole privilege to initiate force legally in the society? Only the state monopoly can initiate force legally, and via it several lobby and interest groups. Only the government has an authority to rob you legally, tax you, indebt you, abduct and indoctrinate your child, sell unborn generations for debt slaves, wage a war, counterfeit money and slaughter millions legally.

The following evidence is purely empirical. The governments of the earth have embarked on huge and unnecessary prestige investments over the past fifty-hundred years, which have consumed the reserves and future of societies, construction of road networks, global wars. The invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan has wasted more fuel in one day than India’s annual consumption. In China, the world’s most populous country, phantom metropolises are being built in series that no one will ever live in. This project by the Chinese Communist Party has wasted a lot of energy so far. Jobs created from loans that solve nothing are merely propaganda-worthy, stimulus programs. Credit expansions, that is, the central banks have blown bubble in the real estate market, and the inevitable pop (1928, 2008). Enormous energy that went to nothing. Ongoing crisis management, another counterproductive way to waste energy.

As the great Milton Friedman put it, the state is like a spending addict. Although he did not have a negligible role either in the bubbles blown by manipulating central bank interest rates. How can we restrain the government from overspending, even for the sake of my climate protection?

The answer is in the current global monetary system, as is the key to the solution as well. The state can do all this because its laws keep the central bank in a monopoly position, which has a bottomless pocket. In other words every country in the world today uses fiat currency. Currencies hastily printed on worthless paper in themselves, behind which there is no cover but the promise of the government. Their value is constantly deteriorating, meaning that their use is based on the consumption of future reserves. That is, the government is legally robbing us with the paper money inflation. This is a theft. So the government is the biggest and only counterfeiter because everyone else is just counterfeiting counterfeit money by default.

It is also impossible to estimate how it has contributed to climate change and how much damage it has done so far. It is enough to say that a single war could not be funded for a day with no fiat money. Of course the welfare state can’t be financed with no counterfeit, token money. And the same rules apply to all ridiculous, and meaningless government programs. So it can be said that for more than a hundred years there has been no real money in circulation only symbolic, since abandonment of gold standard. We are forced to use toy money, while we’re looted unnoticed. The same happens than happened in the later centuries of Roman Empire, hyperinflation.

How can we return to gold standard while we extremely depend on the government money, in spite of fact that they became absolutely devalued within hundred years? This is the true problem and not a climate change, which is only one of consequences of this problem. I would say the full power of central banks must be abolished and we must return to gold standard, whose limitations limit opportunities and allow no society to live above them. If this were to happen, the consumer society would be replaced by a value-creating and value-preserving society.

Sounds absurd, and utopistic, eh? Absolutely, since everyone says it’s not possible. The answer, however, is that it is no less utopian and absurd that the current monetary system would be sustainable, and the climate change can be solved by any means. If we take seriously this issue there’s no easy way out. We either return to gold standard, solve and forget this problem once and all or we must watch idly collapsing civilizations, and global ecological disaster, and God knows what, while babbling only about what we should do.

We know what we have to do, because it’s obvious. The only problem is that there is no interest behind it. Politicians and central bankers have no interest in solving the problem because it would mean the end of their power. But we cannot expect a solution from those who are causing the problem.

The conclusion is that the global warming propaganda is a double edged sword, which we must use to seize the virtually unlimited power of central banks. And there is no evidence that any global problem can be solved centrally. All problems must be resolved locally first, and the problem will be solved globally.

The ideal would be for all major political units to disappear and the world to be dotted with tens of thousands of free small city-states and cantons, modeled on Singapore, the purest and most developed country in the world, which is a rarity today. The free market economy based on gold standard is the cheapest, cleanest, and best solution, and the only solution for all social problems simultaneously.